TO THE surprise of many, Bat Khurts, the head of Mongolia’s
National Security Council, is back at his desk in Ulaanbaatar, and not
sitting in a German prison, awaiting trial for his alleged involvement
in a kidnapping in 2003. The charges that allowed his detention have
been dropped. Among those surprised was the Foreign Office in Britain, apparently,
where Mr Khurts was arrested last year in controversial circumstances.
He was extradited to Germany in August, and his trial was due to begin
on October 24th. Germany’s Chancellor, Angela Merkel is due in Mongolia
on a planned visit on October 12th.
Besides
affecting Mongolia’s relations with Britain, which are now tetchy, and
with Germany, which is in its good books, the case has cast depressing
light on the thuggery of Mongolia’s security services. It has also been a
constant reminder of a grisly political assassination with long-lasting
effects.
Mr Khurts
faced charges related to a kidnapping in May 2003 in the French port of
Le Havre. Damiran Enkhbat, a Mongolian who had gone into exile after
being freed early from a jail sentence for assault, was duped into going
to a McDonald’s for what was supposed to be a meeting with a
compatriot. Instead, he was set upon by four men, drugged, bundled
unconscious into a car and driven across Europe for four days, before
being put on a Mongolian Airlines flight from Berlin to Ulaanbaatar. Mr
Khurts, who at the time ran Mongolia’s main spy agency, was accused of
being one of Mr Enkhbat's assailants, and the driver of the car.
On
return, Mr Enkhbat was detained as a suspect in the brutal murder in
1998 of Sanjasuuren Zorig, who had been the most prominent leader of the
country’s democratic revolution in 1989-90, and was at that time in
government as the infrastructure minister. Some of his supporters
believe that, at the age of just 36, he was about to become prime
minister, and was assassinated on the order of corrupt politicians who
saw their interests threatened. His murder remains unsolved.
Despite alleged torture, Mr Enkhbat never admitted any involvement. Amnesty International, a human-rights lobby, campaigned for him when he was denied access both to a lawyer and to medical care for a life-threatening condition. He
died shortly after his release from prison in 2006, as a result,
believe his family, of his maltreatment in detention. His children, who
are German citizens, brought charges against Mr Khurts.
Mongolian
officials do not bother to deny that the kidnapping happened. As if it
were an unfortunate but rather trifling oversight, they say they have
accepted it was wrong, apologised and everybody should move on. Clearly
it did not affect Mr Khurts’s climb up the ladder of Mongolia’s security
establishment. So it was natural that he should be the man designated
last year to take part in talks with Britain on closer security
co-operation.
He was given a visa, in response to an application accompanied by a diplomatic note verbale,
and his trip was discussed in advance by the countries’ respective
ambassadors and their host governments. But instead of chewing the cud
over an important partnership, he found himself locked up: arrested on
arrival at Heathrow airport.
Tsogtbaatar
Damdin, state secretary at Mongolia’s foreign ministry, says Mongolia
remains baffled by what he describes as the British “entrapment” of Mr
Khurts. Like Germany, he insists that his release is purely the result
of a judicial decision, unrelated to political considerations such as
Mrs Merkel’s imminent visit.
That
is still scheduled, though there must be a risk it will be derailed by
unrelenting turmoil in the euro zone. But, says Mr Tsogbaatar, Mongolia
is “grateful” to the Germans, and most Mongolians seem to take it for
granted that the release is a goodwill gesture intended to smooth Mrs
Merkel's way. Mr Khurts arrived back, if not quite to a hero’s welcome,
than at least to the handshake of a deputy foreign minister (who was at
the airport by coincidence, says Mr Tsogtbaatar).
A
spokesman at the German embassy in Ulaanbaatar says that Mr Khurts was
freed after his country’s second-highest court (after the constitutional
court) ruled that charges of “Verschleppung”,
a specific form of abduction covered under article 234(a) of Germany’s
criminal code, should be dropped. This was the count which justified his
detention. Charges of “deprivation of freedom” and “causing bodily
harm” still stand, but Mr Khurts seems unlikely ever to face them.
The
German spokesman says there were contacts with Britain before Mr Khurts
arrived back in Mongolia on September 27th. But two days later, a
foreign-office spokesman contacted by The Economist was unaware
that he was free. Indeed, Germany seems to have managed the release
very quietly. Few if any German and British newspapers have mentioned
it.
Britain
denies Mr Khurts was entrapped, and also emphasises the separation of
its judicial and political processes. Indeed, having managed to
antagonise Mongolia, a small but booming economy, with what turned out
to be a fool’s errand of an extradition action, some officials may be
wishing they were more co-ordinated than they are.
Source: www.economist.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment